The Northern Andes
Northern Andes ecoregion, extending from Venezuela to northern Peru, contains
an exceptionally diverse set of landscapes. Its rugged topography, extreme
climatic variation, geologic and biogeographic history have created a
unique collection of habitats found nowhere else on Earth.
The montane forests and meadows of the region nurture a rich complex
of species, including many that are endemic. Some of the more well-known
representatives of local fauna are the spectacled bear, the puma and the
Andean tapir. The biota of the Northern Andean paramos is equally outstanding.
These unique high altitude grasslands developed in altitudinal isolation,
leading to an exceptional degree of biological diversity. It has been
estimated that up to 60 percent of this ecosystem's approximately
3 000 to 4 000 species of vascular plants may be endemic.
Intense pressures from urbanization, logging, grazing and land conversion
threaten the Northern Andes ecosystem. As habitats are destroyed, animal
and plant populations decrease, and many species eventually become extinct.
Since habitat loss is highly correlated with the intensity of human population
and activities, a map showing the location of people and their economic
activities provides a close approximation to a map of threats to biodiversity.
By mapping demographic and related variables, WWF can strategize conservation
action across an ecoregion. These maps help target operations in regions
where threats co-occur with important biological phenomena. Areas with
relatively little threat are prime candidates for new reserves or wildlife
corridors between reserves.
Population growth is a useful indicator of current and
future threat to biodiversity as high growth rates are indicative of an
increase in consumption and the exploitation of natural resources. Consequently,
habitat and species are adversely affected. Conversely, depopulation of
an area (negative growth) can support biodiversity if previously exploited
lands are left to grow back to a natural state. Examining these patterns
of growth can help WWF detect where threats to biodiversity will continue
to rise in the near term. Current statistics for the Northern Andean countries
show positive growth rates throughout yet growth is significantly lower
in the Andean mountains than in adjacent forest lowlands. In large part,
this is because landless peasants have been moving to the coast or are
attracted to oil or mining developments in the Amazon. The Ecuadorean
canton of Pichincha is the only Andean political unit with a growth rate
over 2 percent. This canton could be losing habitat at an alarming rate.
Population statistics are often only available for large
administrative units such as counties or municipios. Such coarse resolution
makes it difficult to associate population patterns with particular sites
of interest. Human populations tend to concentrate in cities or towns
or locate near roads or other transportation routes. Future human populations
are more likely to settle in these relatively accessible areas as well.
Therefore, mapped layers of roads and towns can indicate probable population
densities at finer scales than entire counties. The maps on this page,
the result of a market accessibility model based on town and road locations,
approximate the distribution of human populations and their activities
in the Northern Andes. The model uses time value as a surrogate for accessibility
to each location throughout the ecoregion. Topography and the networks
of roads, rivers and streams were all used to calculate the results. On
the maps, higher values indicate low accessibility (high travel time requirement),
while lower values indicate high accessibility (low travel time requirement).
In spite of the threat that they present to the natural environment,
roads and other transportation corridors often provide a positive social
function. Better access to urban centers and markets leads to diversification
of rural economies by opening up markets to villagers who want to sell
labor, artisan products or agricultural produce. In some cases, increased
access to towns allows rural people to participate in a wage economy,
potentially reducing the need to exploit local resources. It is more
likely, however, that increased access to urban centers combined with
close proximity to those centers can lead to higher levels of habitat
degradation as a result of cash cropping, logging and other economic
opportunities introduced by market integration. Therefore, priority
areas for conservation will have a better chance of remaining intact
if they are located in relatively inaccessible sites. The accessibility
model provides a useful viability indicator for locating these sites,
which have the potential to function as buffer zones, wildlife corridors
and protected areas. Meanwhile, taking areas of high biological diversity
into account when planning for additional infrastructure will help minimize
the impact of social infrastructure on existing parks and wilderness
areas while supporting human development needs.
[Add article to My Atlas] [Download article as PDF]